About Me

Name: Orville
Biography
Loading...

Guide For Moderates

With election day just three weeks away, I thought it might be helpful to provide moderates with a guide to help them make their decision when they enter the voting booth. Okay, so they're not really booths any more, but you get the picture.

Moderates hold a special place in the U.S. electorate. Since it's assumed that liberals will vote Democrat and conservatives will vote Republican, moderates are the swing voters that both sides court. I've often wondered why it is that moderates can't make up their mind which side they are on. I suspect in some cases, they just like the attention. Others probably just don't want to offend either side, so they play Switzerland and remain neutral. For those moderates who genuinely want to choose, but don't feel like they have a clear-cut choice, I offer some clarity.

There's a tendency to judge a particular candidate by individual issues. The problem with that is, many politicians will sell out to a special interest on an issue if they believe it gets them votes. That's why we call them politicians instead of statesmen. Behind the issues is the notion of a worldview, or what the Germans call Weltanschauung. (NOTE: The Missus is a naturalized German, so you'll have to ask her how to pronounce it correctly.) The worldview is simply the perspective from which you see the world. In the aggregate, you'll vote Democrat if you have a liberal worldview and Republican if you have a conservative worldview. Occasionally there's an independent candidate that will go one way or the other, but there's no Moderate party to speak of, so here's how you can decide:

Liberals believe that people are basically good and can therefore adapt their standards to conform to whatever they would like them to be.
Conservatives believe man is fallen and must look to a higher power for an absolute standard that doesn't change.

Liberals believe organized religion is a corrupting influence that deserves no place in the public sphere.
Conservatives believe religion provides a framework for civilized society and is, sadly, missing from the public sphere. 

Liberals make decisions based on how it makes them feel.
Conservatives make decisions based on data like documented history, statistical analysis and hard science.

Liberals believe in equal outcomes.
Conservatives believe in equal opportunity.

Liberals believe that if you are successful, you must have taken advantage of someone else to get there, therefore you must forfeit your gain. See the previous point.
Conservatives believe that if you are successful, you probably worked hard to get there and are therefore an example for others to follow.

Liberals would rather give a man a fish.
Conservatives would rather teach a man to fish.

Liberals believe government is the solution.
Conservatives believe government is the problem. See Ronald Reagan.

Liberals believe fetuses should die, but convicted murderers who had bad childhoods should live.
Conservatives believe unborn children should live, but convicted murderers who are responsible for their actions should die.

Liberals believe that the family structure is irrelevant and all children need is someone to love them.
Conservatives believe that the best situation for every child is to have a mother and a father that are married and living together.

Liberals believe that America is a scourge on the world and that we are responsibile for all the evils that plague the earth today.
Conservatives believe that America is the greatest country that has ever existed and that we should continue to lead by defending the weak and oppressed and encouraging democratic forms of government, despite what other countries think.

While this list is by no means comprehensive, it will point the way on most important issues. And don't be fooled by people on either side that don't hold true to form on one or two issues. Look below the surface and the worldview will emerge. Then you'll know.

Moderates, take a stand!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Captivating

As a daily reader of the Wall Street Journal editorial page, I regularly find myself saying "that guy's gonna get flamed" in response to some ridiculous comment in a letter or column. Typically, two or three days later, my predictions come true. Since the Missus is usually the only one who hears my prognostications, I don't really get any credit for making them. Come to think of it, I have to work really hard to get any credit from her on most things, but such is my cross to bear. She's still the love of my life.

One such example is the response in today's Journal to the column by Sens. Warner, McCain and Graham regarding their work on the Military Commissions Act of 2006. William D. Allen gets the inaugural Flamethrower Award for calling them on their statement that, "These challenges are in excess of what our soldiers would be afforded as prisoners of war." Why on earth they believe that it's good, or even just, that some al Qaeda terrorist is afforded more protections than a Marine who's conducting himself within the established laws of war is beyond me. I suppose in some twisted world, one might argue they deserve the same treatment, but to elevate the one who purposely targets civilians over the grunt who fights with honor is downright disturbing, especially for U.S. senators who have all served in uniform.

Warner and Graham are both lawyers, so their refusal to come down squarely on the side of the good guys is understandable, if still inexcusable (apologies to Hugh Hewitt). The real disappointment to me is McCain. As a fellow Annapolis grad, I feel betrayed by the senior senator from Arizona that he equates my classmates that are still serving with the scum that behead innocent noncombatants. The real kicker is the fact the he's been on the receiving end of true torture himself, yet refuses to acknowledge that U.S. forces are never going to be treated humanely by this particular breed of enemy. This argument that we have to bend over backwards today in order to avoid putting our military in more danger in some future conflict just doesn't hold water. Any country that lives up to its obligations under the Geneva Conventions will understand that members of al Qaeda don't qualify for those protections. Any country that doesn't abide by Geneva won't care that we coddled terrorists in the past.

John McCain will always have my respect for his service in uniform. It's too bad he sullies that high regard by maintaining untenable positions like this one.

NOTE: The blogger served on active duty for ten years in the U.S. Navy as a helicopter pilot in the Mediterranean and Persian Gulf.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Opening Day

Just getting the blog up and running today. It appears the North Koreans are stirring the pot on the same day that a South Korean is nominated to be U.N. Secretary-General. Should be interesting to see how that plays out.

You can expect us to cover a host of topics going forward, generally from a conservative, Midwest viewpoint. Occasionally, the libertarian peeks out as well. Hopefully, you'll find it interesting. Be back soon.

Ciao
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »